Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)

Kangaro Industries (Retd.) And Ors. vs Jaininder Jain And Anr. on 29 January, 2007

14. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 8 has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of KANGARO INDUSTRIES (R) AND OTHERS v. JAININDER JAIN AND ANOTHER reported in 2022 Live Law (S) 437 and contended that it is not open to the Court in contempt jurisdiction to enlarge the scope of relief claimed in the main proceedings being CS (OS)No.156/2004 and more so, when the initial interim relief is limited to the registered trademark.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - M Mudgal - Full Document

Amazon.Com Nv Investment Holdings Llc vs Signature Not Verified Digitally ... on 14 July, 2022

15. The learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of AMAZON.COM NV INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC v. FUTURE RETAIL LIMITED AND OTHERS reported in (2022) 1 SCC 209 and brought to the notice of this Court paragraph Nos.56, wherein discussed with regard to Order 39 Rule 1, 2 and 2A. The learned counsel also brought to the notice of this Court paragraph Nos.57 and 58, i.e., reading of Order 39 Rules 2(3) and 2(4) as it originally stood and 21 consequences. Referring to the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2009) 5 SCC 665, extracted paragraph No.38 and in paragraph No.61 discussed with regard to exercising power under Order 39 Rule 2A is punitive in nature and akin to the power to punish for civil contempt.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - N Waziri - Full Document
1