Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 365 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 395 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 65 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 102 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Md. Amir Sah Ansary & Anr on 14 June, 2017
10. PW4 Ct. Suresh is the witness of pointing out of the spot
and the said ATM by the accused Mohd. Sameer @ Amir on
4.4.2015 vide memo Ex.PW4/A. In his crossexamination on
behalf of accused, he replied that IO had not called any public
witness from the neighbour area at the time of preparation of
pointing out memo. PW5 Ct. Ravish Kumar, is the witness of
arrest of accused Mohd. Amir in the court on 18.3.2015 and
disclosure statement made by the said accused is Ex.PW5/C and
the fact of accused kept in muffled face. He is also the witness of
arrest of accused Mohd. Sameer @ Amir in the court on
21.3.2015 and his disclosure statement is Ex.PW5/F. In his cross
examination, he replied that IO had not requested any court staff
or public person present in the court to join the proceedings. PW6
SI Jeet Singh was in the Special Staff, South East, Delhi, who
was the IO of the case FIR No. 175/15 PS Kotla Mubarakpur and
he arrested the accused Mohd. Amir on 3.3.2015 at West Bengal
SC No.562/16/15 State Vs. Mohd. Sameer @ Amir & another Page No.9 of 16
and he recorded the disclosure statement of said accused as
Ex.PW6/C and he also deposed that accused had also got
recovered the stolen property of different cases, which was seized
under Section 102 Cr.P.C. vide memo Ex.PW6/D and that he had
informed the official of PS Pandav Nagar regarding his arrest
and disclosure on 10.3.2015 and he had handed over the copy of
disclosure statement and other documents to the IO of the present
case. In his crossexamination on behalf of the accused, PW6
replied that he did not remember as to whether he had filed the
traveling ticket to West Bengal in case FIR No.175/15 of PS
Kotla Mubarakpur and he did not remember the name of railway
station where they completed their journey but he again said it
was Howrah. He replied that he made arrival entry at PS Bagichi,
West Bengal but he did not remember the date of the same and
that he had also taken two local police officials from PS Bagichi,
but he did not remember their names. He admitted that he had not
made the said police officials of West Bengal Police as witnesses
in the arrest proceedings of accused Mohd. Amir nor he made
any local person as the witness in the proceedings. He did not
remember, if he had filed any document pertaining to their return
from journey.
1