Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.36 seconds)Ripudaman Singh vs Tikka Maheshwar Chand on 6 July, 2021
2. Ripudaman Singh Vs. Tikka Maheshwar
Chand - (2021) 7 SCC 446.
Section 136 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Bhoop Singh vs Ram Singh Major & Ors on 11 September, 1995
"1. Bhoop Singh Vs Ram Singh - (1995) 5
SCC 709.
The Registration Act, 1908
Section 23 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 115 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Chandrasekhar Patel vs Ukiabati Patel And Ors. on 17 September, 1976
18. The learned counsel appearing for the legal
heirs of plaintiff No.1-K.M. Malleshaiah arguing in the
same vein accepting the arguments canvassed by the
learned Senior Counsel would add up two grounds.
Referring to the compromise petition vide Ex.P5, he
would vehemently argue and contend that possession
was agreed to be delivered. Therefore, he would point
out that the family never lost possession. He would
1
(1995) 5 SCC 709
2
(2021) 7 SCC 446
24
further contend that if the suit of defendant No.4 in
O.S.No.136/1996 is dismissed as withdrawn, no right
is accrued in favour of defendant No.4 and therefore,
plaintiffs are entitled to seek their legitimate share
even in respect of one acre which was agreed to be
given by defendants 1 to 3 who are the ancestors of
plaintiffs. Reliance is placed on the judgment
rendered by the Orissa High Court in the case of
Chandrashekhar Patel .vs. Ukiabati Patel and
others3.
M/S K.B.Saha And Sons Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Development Consultant Ltd on 12 May, 2008
3. K.B.Saha and sons Private Limited Vs.
Development Consultant Limited - (2008) 8
SCC 564.