Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.36 seconds)

Chandrasekhar Patel vs Ukiabati Patel And Ors. on 17 September, 1976

18. The learned counsel appearing for the legal heirs of plaintiff No.1-K.M. Malleshaiah arguing in the same vein accepting the arguments canvassed by the learned Senior Counsel would add up two grounds. Referring to the compromise petition vide Ex.P5, he would vehemently argue and contend that possession was agreed to be delivered. Therefore, he would point out that the family never lost possession. He would 1 (1995) 5 SCC 709 2 (2021) 7 SCC 446 24 further contend that if the suit of defendant No.4 in O.S.No.136/1996 is dismissed as withdrawn, no right is accrued in favour of defendant No.4 and therefore, plaintiffs are entitled to seek their legitimate share even in respect of one acre which was agreed to be given by defendants 1 to 3 who are the ancestors of plaintiffs. Reliance is placed on the judgment rendered by the Orissa High Court in the case of Chandrashekhar Patel .vs. Ukiabati Patel and others3.
Orissa High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 7 - Full Document
1   2 Next