Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.39 seconds)

Amit Kumar Shaw & Anr vs Farida Khatoon & Anr on 13 April, 2005

(emphasis supplied) 56}To the same effect is the decision of this Court in Amit Kumar Shaw v. Farida Khatoon (2005) 11 SCC 403 where this Court held that a transferor pendente lite may not even defend the title properly as he has no interest in the same or collude with the plaintiff in which case the interest of the purchaser pendente lite will be ignored. To avoid such situations the transferee pendente lite can be added as a party defendant to the case provided his interest is substantial and not just peripheral. This is particularly so where the transferee pendente lite acquires interest in the entire estate that forms Vishal Parekar, PS ...10 ::: Uploaded on - 27/03/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 29/03/2025 08:13:58 ::: 17-wp-3746-2025.doc the subject matter of the dispute. This Court observed: (SCC p.411, para 16).
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 394 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

Rikhu Dev, Chela Bawa Harjug Dass vs Som Dass (Deceased) Through His Chela ... on 28 August, 1975

As already noticed, the court has discretion in the matter which must be judicially exercised and an alienee would ordinarily be joined as a party to enable him to protect his interests. The Court has held that a transferee pendente lite of an interest in immovable property is a representative-in-interest of the party from whom he has acquired that interest. He is entitled to be impleaded in the suit or other proceedings where the transferee pendente lite is made a party to the litigation; he is entitled to be heard in the matter on the merits of the case. To the same effect is the decision of this Court in Rikhu Dev, Chela Bawa Harjug Dass v. Som Dass (deceased) through his Chela Shiama Dass, (1976) 1 SCC 103.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 61 - K K Mathew - Full Document
1