Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 174A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Deepa Verma 19 Sa/299/1999 Ramdas ... on 23 August, 2018
8. In order to prove issuance of proclamation, prosecution has
examined PW-1, Ahlmad from the concerned Court from where the
proclamation was issued. The said witness produced the original record
of FIR No. 198/2018, PS Vikas Puri. Prosecution also examined PW-3
HC Rajesh who was the process server who executed the process U/s
82 Cr. PC. PW-3 has deposed that on 29.05.2023, he was entrusted
with the execution of process u/s 82 Cr. PC against the accused herein
and that he executed the same. The issuance of proclamation u/s 82 Cr.
PC is not challenged by the accused. Thus, it is proved that
State Vs. Sunil Sharma
PS Vikas Puri
FIR No. 129/2024 Page No.4 of 6
proclamation u/s 82 Cr. PC was issued against the accused.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
State vs Sushil Sharma on 19 February, 2007
In the present case, the allegations against the accused are that
he absconded during trial of the case wherein FIR No. 198/18 PS Vikas
Puri, titled as State vs. Sunil Sharma. It is alleged that since the
accused was concealing himself and was avoiding the execution of
warrants, this Court had, by order dated 16.11.2023 declared the
accused as an absconder. On the basis of the said allegations, it is
alleged that accused has committed the offence punishable under
Section 174A of Indian Penal Code.
1