Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)M/S. Canara Nidhi Limited vs M. Shashikala on 23 September, 2019
"55. Further, this Court has repeatedly held that an
application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996
is a summary proceeding not in the nature of a regular
suit - see Canara Nidhi Ltd. v. M. Shashikala 2019 SCC
OnLine SC 1244 at paragraph 20.
M/S. Associated Construction vs Pawanhans Helicopters Pvt. Ltd on 7 May, 2008
As a result, a court
reviewing an arbitral award under Section 34 does not sit
in appeal over the award, and if the view taken by the
arbitrator is possible, no interference is called for -
see Associated Construction v. Pawanhans Helicopters
Ltd. (2008) 16 SCC 128 at paragraph 17.
Ssangyong Engineering And ... vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 8 May, 2019
56. Also, as has been held in the recent
decision Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co.
Ltd. v. NHAI 2019 SCC OnLine SC 677, after the 2015
Amendment Act, this Court cannot interfere with an
arbitral award on merits."
1