Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)
Sanjay Dhingra & Anr vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & Ors on 2 June, 2021 cites

Sidhant Gupta vs Bank Of Baroda & Anr on 10 March, 2021

18. Per contra, it is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that petitioner Sidhant Gupta filed a writ petition bearing W.P.(C) No. 3782/2020 titled as Sidhant Gupta Vs. Bank of Baroda and Anr. and petitioner Sanjay Dhingra filed a writ petition bearing W.P.(C) No. 4053/2020 titled as Sanjay Dhingra Vs. Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd and Anr. and in both the writ petitions the relief which has been claimed is not similar to the relief claimed in the present petition. It is submitted by him that in the present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of the FIR which has not been prayed in the previous two writ petitions.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - P Jalan - Full Document

Sanjay Dhingra vs Dhanlaxmi Bank Limited & Anr on 9 July, 2020

12. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that had the petitioners been given proper hearing and an opportunity to present their side of the case then the said report would not have been prepared to the prejudice of the petitioners. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that prior to the lodging of the FIR respondent No. 2 to 7 and respondent No. 10 and 11 have Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KANT MENDIRATTA Signing Date:07.06.2021 20:31 (VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING) independently initiated their respective proceedings to declare Kwality and its directors as wilful defaulters. It is further submitted that in respect to the actions initiated by respondent No. 11 to declare quality and its directors as wilful defaulters, the petitioner No. 1 filed a Writ Petition bearing WP(C) No. 4053/2020 titled as Sanjay Dhingra Vs. Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. & Anr. impugning the letter dated 22.01.2020 and 12.05.2020 issued by respondent No. 11 declaring the petitioner No. 1 as a wilful defaulter. It is further submitted that this Court vide order dated 09.07.2020 has passed an order that in the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken by the bank against the petitioner and no publication will be done by the bank pursuant to the impugned order therein and the said writ petition is pending adjudication.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - J Nath - Full Document
1