Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.66 seconds)Krishna Kumar Mishra vs Department Of Atomic Energy on 23 March, 2017
3. Shri K.S. Mahadevan Advocate representing the appellant was present in
person. The respondent Shri Krishna Kumar V., Under Secretary, Department
of Atomic Energy, Mumbai attended the hearing through video conferencing.
Mr. Alok Shukla vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India ... on 23 May, 2013
2. The CPIO replied to the RTI application by stating that the reply to Query
no. 1 has been transferred to PIO, DGFT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
The respondent in response to query nos. 2 to 4 stated that the information
sought by the appellant was already sought by him vide RTI application dated
30.03.2018, which was duly responded by the respondent vide letter dated
11.04.2018 and the appellant has repeated the RTI request, which is not
permissible as per the decision No. CIC/AD/A/2013/001326-AS dated
25.06.2014 passed by CIC. In this regard, the respondent denied information to
the appellant. The FAA relying upon the decision passed by CIC dated
23.05.2013 in the matter of Sh. Alok Shukla vs. CPIO, SEBI held that the CPIO
cannot create new records in order to address the specific queries of the
appellant, and concurred with the action of the CPIO of transferring the RTI
application and not responding to the similar queries responded earlier by the
CPIO.
1