cites: 59127686

M/S Dharamvir And Company vs Delhi Development Authority on 7 July, 2022

Announced in open court by RUCHIKA RUCHIKA SINGLA on 04th February, 2023. SINGLA Date: 2023.02.04 16:06:43 +0530 (RUCHIKA SINGLA) Addl. Distt. Judge-03, North-West Distt., Rohini Courts, Delhi. This judgment contains 14 pages and each page is checked and signed by me. Arb. no. 58288/16 Dharamvir vs. Delhi Development Authority Page no. 14 of 14

Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 2 - M K Ohri - Full Document

Section 12 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 7297

Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 22777

The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 30941

Section 18 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 873

Renusagar Power Co. Ltd vs General Electric Co on 7 October, 1993

19. It was observed that it is now clear that the expression "public policy of India" as contained in Section 34 would now mean the "fundamental policy of Indian law" as explained in Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority (2015) 3 SCC 49 i.e. the fundamental policy of Indian law would be relegated to the Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electronic Co., 1994 Supp (1) SCC 644 understanding of this expression.

Supreme Court of India Cites 62 - Cited by 661 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

The Limitation Act, 1963

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 47361

Aravali Power Company Pvt. Ltd. vs M/S. Era Infra Engineering Ltd. on 12 September, 2017

In Aravali Power Company Pvt. Ltd. v M/S. Era Infra Engineering Ltd (2017) 15 SCC 32 (which was post the Arb.

Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 36 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Section 14 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2239

Board Of Control For Cricket In India vs Kochi Cricket Pvt Ltd And Etc on 15 March, 2018

In Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Kochi Cricket Pvt. 21 Ltd. and Ors. AIR 2018 SC 1549, the Apex Court explained that there are two rounds of proceedings, one which are initiated before an arbitrator and the second which are initiated in the court. It was explained that if the proceedings in the court by way of Arb.

Supreme Court of India Cites 109 - Cited by 131 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results