Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (1.32 seconds)

R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs The Union Of India(With Connected ... on 9 April, 1957

By a portion of cl. (d) of s. 3 and the whole of B. 8 being declared unconstitutional the Act is not thereby affected as they are severable from the rest of the Act. As a consequence of excision of that portion and of s. 8 from the Act the operation of the remaining portion of the Act remains unimpaired. R. M. D. Chamarbaughwala v. The Union of India(1). As a result of s. 8 being declared invalid, all the goods seized from the petitioners having been seized without the authority of law must be returned to the respective petitioners. It will be for the Government to take such action in regard to the proceedings taken or prosecutions commenced as is in accordance with the law laid down in this Judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 336 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next