Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.17 seconds)Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 158 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Nadeem Mohammed on 4 November, 2009
In case referred above, the petitioner has been served with a
notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. by the Ld. MM having been satisfied
CR No. 44/13 1 of 3
that a prima facie offence under Section 279/338 IPC was made out
against him.
The Maharashtra State Electricit ... vs Dr.Ram P.Kishanrao Chidrawar on 20 October, 2011
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for petitioner that even as
per statement of complainant, on the basis of which FIR in this case was
registered, he i.e. complainant was crossing the road simply by raising
hand towards the incoming traffic. There is evidence that spot was a
Zebracrossing. In such a circumstance even if he i.e. complainant was
hit by the petitioner driving a motorcycle, it was complainant himself
who was at fault and not the petitioner. As per Ld. Counsel, complainant
should have been accused and not the petitioner. Explaining that Ld.
MM had authority not to serve notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. even if
the petitioner was summoned to face trial. Ld. Counsel attracted
attention of this court towards Section 158 Cr.P.C. where the magistrate
could stop proceedings if it was found that no offence was made out. Ld.
Counsel relies upon a case titled as State of Maharashtra Vs. Ram
Pandharinath Chidrawar 2007 Cri. L. J. 827.
1