Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.24 seconds)Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
The Central Excise Act, 1944
Sunaina Devi & Anr vs The State Of Bihar on 27 October, 2016
The present case stands
squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble
Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sunaina (supra).
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mohammad Basim Akram @ Mohammad Wasim ... vs The State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2021
21. It has been held by this Court in Mohammad
Basim Akram v. State of Bihar [2022 (6) BLJ 540] that
when the driver of a vehicle is found to be carrying some
quantity of intoxicant or liquor in the vehicle for his
personal consumption without any knowledge of the
owner of the vehicle, such vehicle cannot be construed of
having indulged in transportation of illicit liquor. The
facts of the case was that 8.8 litre illicit liquor was
recovered from the cabin of the driver and driver had
confessed that he had purchased the contraband for his
personal consumption and kept in the cabin.
Article 300 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Jilson Thomas C vs State Of Kerala on 22 June, 2011
22. There is also a possibility of situation where
driver of a motorcycle or car or other vehicles may be
carrying small quantity of contraband in his clothes like
in pocket of shirt or pant. In such situation also, it would
be completely erroneous to hold that vehicle was being
used for carrying the contraband. Hon'ble High Court of
Kerala in Wilson C.C. v. State of Kerala [2022 LiveLaw
(Ker) 627] has expressed similar view. In that case, a
person was driving a vehicle and 0.06 grams of LSD
Stamp was recovered from wallet kept in his pocket.