Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.05 seconds)

Punjab State Civil Supplies ... vs Pyare Lal on 9 November, 2012

5. Neither the entire instructions issued by the State of Haryana nor an order passed subsequently by the Full Bench on 11.08.2014 in Review Petition filed in Pyare Lal case itself was brought to my notice in Dhir Chand case (supra). While reviewing judgment dated 09.11.2012, the Full Bench held that the State is well within its right to withhold the grant of leave encashment during the pendency of departmental enquiry and criminal proceedings. The Full Bench held that the benefit of leave encashment cannot be extended under the Punjab Civil Services Rules if the proceedings are pending against an employee and only 100% provisional pension at the time of retirement is to be paid alongwith commutation of the pension.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 76 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Mr. Subhash Chandra vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 9 July, 2009

8 of 14 ::: Downloaded on - 09-12-2025 22:06:18 ::: CWP-8419-2024 -9- incuriam in their Lordships' attention had never been adequately directed to either the relevant facts or the relevant law." [See A Decision Per Incuriam? -Prof.A.W.Brian Simpson, The Law Quarterly Review, volume 125, July 2009, p.433] We have noticed hereinbefore that the premise on which S. Pushpa (supra) was rendered, namely, Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra), had no application to union territories was not correct."
Central Information Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 136 - Full Document
1   2 Next