Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.20 seconds)
Sub-Inspector C.P. Uma Shanker Sharma vs State Of U.P. Thru P.S. & Secy on 22 July, 2010 cites

Vineet Narain & Others vs Union Of India & Another on 18 December, 1997

6. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgements while interpreting the provision contained in Article 142 of the Constitution of India held that State or its instrumentalities have got no right to avoid the direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that where executive failed to fill up the gap in legislation the judiciary have to step in. Direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India is mend to do justice and it enlarges the power of Hon'ble Supreme Court for making an order to do complete justice between parties or in public interest vide (1984) 3 SCC 549, Azhar Ali Khan V. Commr. Municipal Corpn. Of Delhi; (1998) 1 SCC 226, Vineet Narain v. Union of India; (2006) 2 SCC 677, Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi); (1993) 2 SCC 703, Kashinath G. Jalmi (Dr) v. The Speaker; (2006) 1 SCC 737, Raj Kumar V. Union of India; (1991) 4 SCC 584, Union Carbide Corpn. v. Union of India; (2005) 3 SCC 284, Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan; (2003) 6 SCC 581; (1993) 4 SCC 119, R.K.Jain v. Union of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 474 - Full Document

Dr. Kashinath G. Jalmi And Anr. Etc. Etc vs Speaker And Ors on 31 March, 1993

6. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgements while interpreting the provision contained in Article 142 of the Constitution of India held that State or its instrumentalities have got no right to avoid the direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that where executive failed to fill up the gap in legislation the judiciary have to step in. Direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India is mend to do justice and it enlarges the power of Hon'ble Supreme Court for making an order to do complete justice between parties or in public interest vide (1984) 3 SCC 549, Azhar Ali Khan V. Commr. Municipal Corpn. Of Delhi; (1998) 1 SCC 226, Vineet Narain v. Union of India; (2006) 2 SCC 677, Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi); (1993) 2 SCC 703, Kashinath G. Jalmi (Dr) v. The Speaker; (2006) 1 SCC 737, Raj Kumar V. Union of India; (1991) 4 SCC 584, Union Carbide Corpn. v. Union of India; (2005) 3 SCC 284, Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan; (2003) 6 SCC 581; (1993) 4 SCC 119, R.K.Jain v. Union of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 87 - J S Verma - Full Document

Union Carbide Corporation Etc. Etc vs Union Of India Etc. Etc on 3 October, 1991

6. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgements while interpreting the provision contained in Article 142 of the Constitution of India held that State or its instrumentalities have got no right to avoid the direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that where executive failed to fill up the gap in legislation the judiciary have to step in. Direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India is mend to do justice and it enlarges the power of Hon'ble Supreme Court for making an order to do complete justice between parties or in public interest vide (1984) 3 SCC 549, Azhar Ali Khan V. Commr. Municipal Corpn. Of Delhi; (1998) 1 SCC 226, Vineet Narain v. Union of India; (2006) 2 SCC 677, Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi); (1993) 2 SCC 703, Kashinath G. Jalmi (Dr) v. The Speaker; (2006) 1 SCC 737, Raj Kumar V. Union of India; (1991) 4 SCC 584, Union Carbide Corpn. v. Union of India; (2005) 3 SCC 284, Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan; (2003) 6 SCC 581; (1993) 4 SCC 119, R.K.Jain v. Union of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 423 - Full Document

Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005

6. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgements while interpreting the provision contained in Article 142 of the Constitution of India held that State or its instrumentalities have got no right to avoid the direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that where executive failed to fill up the gap in legislation the judiciary have to step in. Direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India is mend to do justice and it enlarges the power of Hon'ble Supreme Court for making an order to do complete justice between parties or in public interest vide (1984) 3 SCC 549, Azhar Ali Khan V. Commr. Municipal Corpn. Of Delhi; (1998) 1 SCC 226, Vineet Narain v. Union of India; (2006) 2 SCC 677, Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi); (1993) 2 SCC 703, Kashinath G. Jalmi (Dr) v. The Speaker; (2006) 1 SCC 737, Raj Kumar V. Union of India; (1991) 4 SCC 584, Union Carbide Corpn. v. Union of India; (2005) 3 SCC 284, Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan; (2003) 6 SCC 581; (1993) 4 SCC 119, R.K.Jain v. Union of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 2834 - Full Document

Azhar Ali Khan And Ors. vs Commissioner, Municipal Corporation ... on 18 April, 1984

6. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgements while interpreting the provision contained in Article 142 of the Constitution of India held that State or its instrumentalities have got no right to avoid the direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that where executive failed to fill up the gap in legislation the judiciary have to step in. Direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India is mend to do justice and it enlarges the power of Hon'ble Supreme Court for making an order to do complete justice between parties or in public interest vide (1984) 3 SCC 549, Azhar Ali Khan V. Commr. Municipal Corpn. Of Delhi; (1998) 1 SCC 226, Vineet Narain v. Union of India; (2006) 2 SCC 677, Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi); (1993) 2 SCC 703, Kashinath G. Jalmi (Dr) v. The Speaker; (2006) 1 SCC 737, Raj Kumar V. Union of India; (1991) 4 SCC 584, Union Carbide Corpn. v. Union of India; (2005) 3 SCC 284, Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan; (2003) 6 SCC 581; (1993) 4 SCC 119, R.K.Jain v. Union of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 15 - Full Document
1