Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)
The State Of Punjab vs Gurdas Singh on 31 March, 1998 cites

Union Of India vs V.P. Seth And Another on 11 January, 1994

The facts in the present case are quite similar to that in Union of India vs. V.P. Seth. Here also the only ground on which the order prematurely retiring Gurdas Singh was set aside was that two adverse entries after his promotion from the rank of Asstt. Sub-Inspector to sub-Inspector were not communicated to him and earlier adverse entries could not be taken into account because even when those existed Gurdas Singh had earned his promotion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 53 - Full Document

Union Of India Etc vs M.E. Reddy And Anr on 19 September, 1979

"The learned counsel for the petitioners strongly relies on the decision in Union of India Vs. M.E. Reddy: 1980(1) SCR 736, while Mr. Ujagar Singh refers to a later decision in Brij Mohan Chopra Vs. State of Punjab: 1987(2) SCR 583. Special Leave is granted. Let the appeal be placed for hearing before a larger bench. During the pendency of the appeal operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 110 - S M Ali - Full Document

Brij Mohan Singh Chopra vs State Of Punjab on 11 March, 1987

"The learned counsel for the petitioners strongly relies on the decision in Union of India Vs. M.E. Reddy: 1980(1) SCR 736, while Mr. Ujagar Singh refers to a later decision in Brij Mohan Chopra Vs. State of Punjab: 1987(2) SCR 583. Special Leave is granted. Let the appeal be placed for hearing before a larger bench. During the pendency of the appeal operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 152 - K N Singh - Full Document

Baikuntha Nath Das And Anr vs Chief Distt. Medical Officer, Baripada ... on 19 February, 1992

It is not necessary for us to again reiterate the principles where the Court will interfere in the order of premature retirement of an employee as these have been accurately set down by various pronouncements of this Court and particularly in Baikund Nath Das case. Before the decision to retire a Government servant prematurely is taken the authorities are required to consider the whole record of service. Any adverse entry prior to earning of promotion or crossing of efficiency bar or picking up higher rank is not wiped out and can be taken into consideration while considering the overall performance of the employee during whole of his tenure of service whether it is in public interest to retain him in the service. The whole record of service of the employee will include any uncommunicated adverse entries as well.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 579 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1