Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)
Yogendra Krishna Gaiha vs D/O Revenue on 4 September, 2019 cites

Union Of India & Ors vs Lt. Gen. Rajendra Singh Kadyan & Anr on 28 July, 2000

2. The applicants contend that they are entitled to be put in the HAG+ scale. Earlier they made a representation and when the same was not considered, they filed OA No.3406/2018 and other similar OAs. They were disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to pass orders on the representation. In compliance with the same, the respondents passed orders on 12.03.2019 and on other dates, taking a view that the claims of the applicants cannot be accepted. According to them, the similar claim made in the OA No.478/2015 and OA No.1087/2015, before this Tribunal in Arbind Modi & Ors. and P.R. Ravikumar, retired, CCITs, was rejected through judgment dated 12.08.2015. Mention was also made to SLP No.16231 and 29383 of 2018, wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court stayed the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Union of India Vs. Shri Rajendra and Union of India Vs. Ramphal. Individual orders were passed in respect of the applicants herein. Those orders are challenged in this OA, collectively.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 125 - Full Document

Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 October, 2015

6. From a perusal of the order extracted above, it is evident that though some posts of CCIT in HAG were upgraded to HAG+, the movement thereto, is by way of selection, under the relevant service rules. It is not as if every Chief Commissioner of Income Tax is entitled to 12 OA No.2497/2019 move automatically to HAG+ scale. Further this very issue was examined by this Tribunal in OA No.478/2015 through an elaborated judgment dated 12.08.2015. Though a different view was taken by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Rajendra Vs. UOI & Ors. and Ramphal Vs. UOI & Ors., and the Hon'ble Supreme Court stayed the same. As of now, the matter is under consideration by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. So far as this Tribunal is concerned, the issue has already been decided at its level.
Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 61 - A Mishra - Full Document

Ramphal vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. Through The ... on 4 August, 2007

6. From a perusal of the order extracted above, it is evident that though some posts of CCIT in HAG were upgraded to HAG+, the movement thereto, is by way of selection, under the relevant service rules. It is not as if every Chief Commissioner of Income Tax is entitled to 12 OA No.2497/2019 move automatically to HAG+ scale. Further this very issue was examined by this Tribunal in OA No.478/2015 through an elaborated judgment dated 12.08.2015. Though a different view was taken by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Rajendra Vs. UOI & Ors. and Ramphal Vs. UOI & Ors., and the Hon'ble Supreme Court stayed the same. As of now, the matter is under consideration by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. So far as this Tribunal is concerned, the issue has already been decided at its level.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1