Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)

Manager Govt. Branch Press &. Anr vs D. B. Belliawpa on 30 November, 1978

14. At the cost of repetition we may observe that in the present case, the service of the appellant was not terminated due to unsatisfactory performance or conduct or for any like reason. Therefore, by applying the ratio of Belliappa's case and Sughar Singh's case, we hold that the order dated 13.10.1986 is arbitrary and discriminatory and is, therefore, violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of Iadia.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 299 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Sughar Singh And Ors. on 8 December, 1977

14. At the cost of repetition we may observe that in the present case, the service of the appellant was not terminated due to unsatisfactory performance or conduct or for any like reason. Therefore, by applying the ratio of Belliappa's case and Sughar Singh's case, we hold that the order dated 13.10.1986 is arbitrary and discriminatory and is, therefore, violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of Iadia.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 63 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1