Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 41 (0.66 seconds)Section 50A in The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Girja Shankar Pant & Ors on 18 October, 2000
27. I have considered the affidavit filed by the respondents. I have also considered judgements cited by the learned counsel for the respondents, namely, Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Girja Shankar Pant and others (supra) and G.N. Nayaj v. Goa University (supra). These two judgements have taken a little shift in the principle of bias which I have stated earlier. For arriving at the finding that in this case the Charity Commissioner has not biased, I have considered the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the said two judgements.
State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Shivananda Pathak & Ors on 11 February, 1998
24. The learned advocate for the petitioner has made strong reliance on the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of W.B. and Others v. Shivananda Pathak and others (supra). Before appreciating the ratio of the said judgement, it is necessary to consider the facts of the case in detail which are set out hereinafter:
A. K. Kraipak & Ors. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 April, 1969
14.4 The learned counsel has also relied on the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India reported in AIR 1970 SC 150 particularly paragraph Nos. 15 and 21 of the said judgement.
G.N. Nayak vs Goa Universityand Ors on 29 January, 2002
27. I have considered the affidavit filed by the respondents. I have also considered judgements cited by the learned counsel for the respondents, namely, Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Girja Shankar Pant and others (supra) and G.N. Nayaj v. Goa University (supra). These two judgements have taken a little shift in the principle of bias which I have stated earlier. For arriving at the finding that in this case the Charity Commissioner has not biased, I have considered the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the said two judgements.
Saiyad Mohammad Bakar El-Edroos (Dead) ... vs Abdulhabib Hasan Arab And Ors on 2 April, 1998
The learned counsel submitted that that fact cannot be treated as bias because in the PIL before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Saiyad Mohammad Bakar El-Edroos (Dead) by LRS v. Abdulhabib Hasan Arab and others reported in (1998) 4 SCC 343 the petitioners desired to withdraw the petition and the Hon'ble Supreme Court did not allow them to withdraw and criticised the action.