Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.29 seconds)
Jcit(Osd)(E) Circle-2(1), New Delhi vs Population Services International, ... on 12 February, 2024
cites
Section 80G in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976
The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010
Section 144B in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. ( ... vs The Acit,Cent.Circle-1, Baroda on 8 April, 2021
21. The allegation of the Special Auditor that the assessee has not maintained
separate books of account for the purpose of foreign contribution under the
Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010, is equally unacceptable. As
brought to our notice by learned counsel for the assessee, there is no mandate
under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010 to maintain separate
ITA No. 1805/Del/2023
10
books of account for foreign contribution and business activities. The only
requirement in law is, the assessee must maintain separate bank accounts for
foreign contribution, which the assessee has complied. It is noteworthy, before
the departmental authorities, the assessee has specifically submitted that its
accounts are maintained in ERP software, viz., "Lawson" to record
transaction. It is understood, ERP software can be used to compute figures of
any segment of the entity. Further, we have noted, in case of Ranbaxy
Laboratories Ltd. Vs. ACIT (supra), the Coordinate Bench, while considering
the issue whether separate books of account are required to be maintained
where the accounts are maintained on SAP ERP System, has observed that
SAP based ERP system of accounting tantamount to maintenance of separate
books of account. Thus, applying the ratio laid down by Coordinate Bench, we
have to accept assessee's plea that there is no necessity of maintaining
separate AR books of account, once the accounts are maintained in ERP
system. Thus, in view of the aforesaid, the allegation of the CIT (Exemption)
that due to non-maintenance of separate books of account the condition of 7th
proviso to section 10(230) of the Act is violated, deserves to be rejected.
Union Of India And Others vs Kamlakshi Finance Corporation Ltd. on 24 September, 1991
10. With reference to Revenue's Ground No. 4, suffice is to quote the
decision of the Hon'ble supreme Court in Union of India vs. Kamlakshi
Finance Corporation Ltd. AIR 1992-SC-711:-
1