Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
S.P. Gupta vs Union Of India & Anr on 30 December, 1981
i) The cause of recurring nature in the light of judgment passed by
Hon'ble SC in case of MR Gupta v/s UOI (1996 AIR 669) and many
more judgments like UOI VS Tarsem Singh (CIVIL APPEAL NO.5151-
5152 OF 2008) passed by Hon'ble SC. The over time register is
maintained by the concerned Station Superintendent for which no role
has to play by the applicant. Therefore, the respondents cannot take
the advantage of their own wrong. However, the overtime claim of the
applicant may be verified from their computerize data established and
maintained by the respondent department in the name of NMS. The
respondents have placed nothing on record to show that the applicant
has not performed duty in access to rostered hours. The impugned
order dated 02.08.2023 (Annexure A/5) has been passed without
sufficient reason and is not at all justified as such not acceptable in the
eyes of law. Since the applicant was working under the control and
supervision of the Station Superintendent (erstwhile Station Masters as
mentioned in the above printed serial number 5917) are responsible for
maintenance of overtime registers properly and correctly.
1