Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.25 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Smt. Prema Devi vs Joint Director Of Consolidation (Head ... on 13 December, 1968
Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma, AIR 1967 Mad 429; Smt. Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur, AIR 1970 All 238; Vaddaboyina Sesha Reddi v. Vaddaboying Tulasamma, AIR 1969 Andh Pra 300; Mali Bewa v. Dadhi Das, AIR 1960 Orissa 81; Jaria Devi v. Shyam Sundar Agarwalla, AIR 1959 Cal 338; Damodhar Rao v. Bhima Rao, AIR 1965 Mys 290.
Mali Bewa vs Dadhi Das on 21 July, 1959
Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma, AIR 1967 Mad 429; Smt. Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur, AIR 1970 All 238; Vaddaboyina Sesha Reddi v. Vaddaboying Tulasamma, AIR 1969 Andh Pra 300; Mali Bewa v. Dadhi Das, AIR 1960 Orissa 81; Jaria Devi v. Shyam Sundar Agarwalla, AIR 1959 Cal 338; Damodhar Rao v. Bhima Rao, AIR 1965 Mys 290.
Mangal Singh & Ors vs Shrimati Rattno & Anr on 6 April, 1967
In Mangal Singh's case, AIR 1967 SC 1786 it was observed;--
Gadam Reddayya vs Varapula Venkataraju And Anr. on 14 July, 1964
18. We are unable to subscribe to the view taken in Gadam Reddayya v. Varapula Venkataraju, AIR 1965 Andh Pra 66. In that case a widow by name Challamma adopted the plaintiff some time after her husband's death early in 1935. Shortly thereafter, there were some disputes between the plaintiff and Challamma which were ultimately referred to some mediators for settlement. Ultimately it ended in settlement evidenced by Ex. A-8 by and under which she was given four acres of wet land and one acre of dry land to be enjoyed by her for her life and the rest of the property to be taken by the plaintiff in recognition of his rights as an adopted son. In that case Chellarnma had no sort of title to the five acres of land which was allotted to her under settlement Ex. A. 8 before that settlement had taken place because by virtue of the adoption her adopted son had become owner of all the properties owned by her. Therefore in our opinion Section 14(2) would be attracted in the case, there being no pre-existing right in the widow to specific properties allotted to her under the settlement.
The Hindu Women's Rights To Property Act, 1937
Jaria Devi vs Shyam Sundar Agarwalla And Ors. on 3 June, 1957
Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma, AIR 1967 Mad 429; Smt. Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur, AIR 1970 All 238; Vaddaboyina Sesha Reddi v. Vaddaboying Tulasamma, AIR 1969 Andh Pra 300; Mali Bewa v. Dadhi Das, AIR 1960 Orissa 81; Jaria Devi v. Shyam Sundar Agarwalla, AIR 1959 Cal 338; Damodhar Rao v. Bhima Rao, AIR 1965 Mys 290.
Thatha Gurunadham Chetti vs Thatha Navaneethamma (Died) And Anr. on 30 September, 1966
Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma, AIR 1967 Mad 429; Smt. Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur, AIR 1970 All 238; Vaddaboyina Sesha Reddi v. Vaddaboying Tulasamma, AIR 1969 Andh Pra 300; Mali Bewa v. Dadhi Das, AIR 1960 Orissa 81; Jaria Devi v. Shyam Sundar Agarwalla, AIR 1959 Cal 338; Damodhar Rao v. Bhima Rao, AIR 1965 Mys 290.
Vaddaboyina Sesha Reddi vs Vaddaboying Tulasamma And Ors. on 22 November, 1967
Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma, AIR 1967 Mad 429; Smt. Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur, AIR 1970 All 238; Vaddaboyina Sesha Reddi v. Vaddaboying Tulasamma, AIR 1969 Andh Pra 300; Mali Bewa v. Dadhi Das, AIR 1960 Orissa 81; Jaria Devi v. Shyam Sundar Agarwalla, AIR 1959 Cal 338; Damodhar Rao v. Bhima Rao, AIR 1965 Mys 290.