Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.34 seconds)The Advocates Act, 1961
Section 56 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Devesh Cinemas, Faridabad vs Ito Ward - 2(1), Faridabad on 12 July, 2022
12. While dealing with an identical issue, the Coordinate Bench in case
of M/s. Dayalu Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has held as under :-
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Gvk Inds. Ltd & Anr vs The Income Tax Officer & Anr on 1 March, 2011
Therefore, we are inclined to follow the ratio laid
down in the case of Cinestan Entertainment P. Ltd. Supra and
hold that the Ld. A.O and CIT(A) have committed an error in
rejected the valuation done by the assessee from prescribed
expert as per the prescribed method.
Agro Porfolio Private Ltd., New Delhi vs Ito, Ward- 1(4), New Delhi on 16 May, 2018
16. The Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal while lying down the
above ratio has also considered the decision of the Coordinate
bench in Agro Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO which has been relied
by the CIT(A).
Section 142 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sparsh Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. , Delhi vs Ito Ward 2(4), Faridabad on 2 November, 2022
Order of Tribunal in the matter of Dayalu Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
ITO in ITA No. 6173/Del/2019, Dayalu Fashion Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO in
IETA o. 6174/Del/2019 and Devesh Cinemas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO in ITA
No. 6184/Del/2019 for Assessment Year 2015-16
Order of Tribunal in the matter of Sparsh Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
ITO in ITA No. 170 and 246/Del/2022 for Assessment Year 2015-16.
Judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Pr.
Commissioner of Income Tax-2 Vs. M/s Cinestan Entertainment Pvt.
Ltd. in ITA No. 1007/Del/2019.
Abhirvey Projects Private Limited, New ... vs Acit Circle-1(2), New Delhi on 27 December, 2022
Order of Tribunal in the matter of Abhirvey Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
ACIT in ITA No. 9400/Del/2019 for Assessment Year 2015-16.