Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.25 seconds)Section 19 in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Harshad Chiman Lal Modi vs Dlf Universal & Anr on 26 September, 2005
It has been further held that
any order passed by a court without jurisdiction would be
coram non judice, being a nullity, the same ordinarily should
not be given effect to. In para 23, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
has relied on its judgment delivered in the case of Harshad
Chiman Lal Modi Vs. DLF Universal Ltd., (2005) 7 SCC 791,
wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that where a
court has no jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the suit by
reason of any limitation imposed by statute, charter or
commission, it cannot take up the cause or matter. An order
passed by a court having no jurisdiction is a nullity.
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 December, 2004
23. The judgment relied on by Shri Joshi, learned
counsel, delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware Vs. State of Maharashtra And Others,
(2005) 1 SCC 590, would not lend any assistance to him, as in
the said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has discussed at
length about the Public Interest Litigation; its meaning, nature,
scope and maintainability. In the instant case, as stated earlier,
even though the original petition was filed as Public Interest
Litigation, this Court had directed the same to be considered
under the Act, and the same was heard by the learned Single
Judge of this Court.