Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Uptron India Limited vs Shammi Bhan & Anr on 6 February, 1998
" 32. The contract of employment referred to in the earlier part of clause (bb) has to be the same as is referred to in the latter part. This is clear by the use of words "such contract" in the earlier part of this clause. What the clause, therefore, means is that there should have been a contract of employment for a fixed term between the employer and the workman containing a stipulation that the services could be terminated even before the expiry of the period of contract. If such contract, on the expiry of its original period, is not renewed and the services are terminated as a consequence of that period, it would not amount to "retrenchment". Similarly, if the services are terminated even before the expiry of the period of contract but in pursuance of a stipulation contained in that contract that the services could be so terminated, then in that case also, the termination would not amount to "retrenchment".
M/S. Escorts Medical Centre vs Presiding Officer, Industrial ... on 3 October, 2000
This view finds support from a decision of this court in Escorts Ltd. v. Presiding Officer."
1