Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.27 seconds)

Ksl & Industries Ltd vs National Textiles Corporation Ltd on 14 August, 2012

65. Even the decisions relied upon by the petitioner does not advance its case. The reliance placed by the petitioner on KSL (Supra) is misplaced, as the factual matrix of that case is clearly distinguishable from the present matter. In the said case, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was terminable upon a specific contingency, entitling the respondent to terminate forthwith if definitive agreements were not executed to its satisfaction within 240 days. Although this right accrued on or about 14.07.2009, the respondent delayed the issuance of the termination letter until 14.09.2010. During this intervening period, the respondent, through its conduct, acquiesced to the petitioner's continuous performance and took affirmative steps to convey its intention to extend the MOU, thereby attracting the legal implications of novation under Section 62 of the Contract Act. Conversely, in the present case, it is an admitted position that the petitioner repeatedly requested extensions of time to clear pending dues, and despite the respondent giving 'Cure Notice' and 'Termination Notice' the petitioner ultimately failed to make the requisite payments.
Delhi High Court Cites 71 - Cited by 23 - V Sanghi - Full Document

M/S Inter Ads Exhibition Pvt Ltd vs Busworld International Cooperatieve ... on 13 January, 2020

30. To buttress his contention, he has placed reliance on the following decisions: (i) Yassh Deep Builders vs. Sushil Kumar Singh & Anr., 2023 SCC Online Del 1499 (ii) Bharat Catering Corporation vs. IRCTC., 2009 SCC Online Del 3418 (iii) Overnite Express Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation., 2020 SCC Online Del 2093 (iv) Inter Ads Exhibition Pvt. Ltd vs. Busworld International Cooperatieve Vennootschap Met BeperkteAnasprakelijkheid.,2020 SCC OnLine Del 351 (v) Radha Sundar Dutta v. Md. Jahadur Rahim & Ors., 1959 SCR 1309 and (vi) Dena Bank v. Kamlesh Rani, 2011 SCC Online Del 1614.
Delhi High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 18 - J Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next