Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.54 seconds)Section 196 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 505 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 108A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Anil Kumar & Ors vs M.K Aiyappa & Anr on 1 October, 2013
In the case of Anil Kumar v. M.K. Aiyappa, (2013) 10
SCC 705, it was held as under:
New India Assurance Co Ltd. vs Krishna Kumar Pandey on 6 December, 2019
5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in 'New India Assurance Co.
Ltd. Vs. Krishna Kumar Pandey', Crl. Appeal No.1852 of 2019
decided on 06.12.2019, made the following observations :
Taron Mohan vs State & Anr on 25 January, 2021
In this regard, it would also be apt to quote another
judgment of Taron Mohan v. State & Anr, Criminal Rev. Petition
646/2018, decided on 25.01.2021, wherein Hon'ble Delhi High Court
has observed as under:-
Brinda Karat & Anr. vs State Of Nct Of Delhi Through Its ... on 13 June, 2022
15. The aforementioned judgment (Brinda Karat) squarely
applies to the present case at hand and it is a settled position of law that
for the purpose of ordering an investigation U/s 156(3) Cr.PC or for
taking cognizance of the alleged offences, Ld. Trial Court is required to
take cognizance of the facts before it, which is not permissible, without
there being a valid sanction as required U/s 196 Cr.PC. As per the ratio
of the judgment Brinda Karat (Supra), sanction U/s 196 Cr.PC is also
Crl. Rev.28/2023 Dr. Satya Prakash Gautam Vs. The State & Anr. Page 9 of 11
required at the stage of exercising power U/s 156(3) Cr.PC i.e. for
directing investigation qua the offences mentioned in section 196 of the
Code.