Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)Rajnesh vs Neha on 4 November, 2020
In so far as prayer 'a' seeking direction to the subordinate courts
to ensure strict compliance with the directions passed by the Hon'ble
Apex Court in Rajnesh v. Neha and Another(supra) is concerned, it
is not in doubt that the directions issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court
are binding on all courts including the High Court. In order to ensure
the compliance, the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court has
already been circulated with all the concerned family courts dealing
with the disputes in relation to the maintenance under the various
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:HARMINDER KAUR CRL.M.C. 3054/2022 Page 8 of 9
Signing Date:03.07.2023
18:49:13
Acts. Therefore, this court does not feel it apposite to pass any further
directions in that regard.
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Inder Mohan Goswami & Another vs State Of Uttaranchal & Others on 9 October, 2007
14. He further relies upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble
Apex Court in Inder Mohan Goswami and Anr. vs. State of
Uttranchal and Ors.:(2007) 12 SCC 1, to contend that the issuance of
non-bailable warrants involves interference with personal liberty and it
is only when the Court is satisfied that the person will not voluntarily
appear before the Court, that such steps can be taken.
Section 28A in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 128 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1