Hero Vinoth (Minor) vs Seshammal on 8 May, 2006
(i) (2006) 5 Supreme Court Cases 545 HERO VINOTH (MINOR) VS. SESHAMMAL.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.41 seconds)Kashmir Singh vs Harnam Singh & Anr on 3 March, 2008
(iii) 2008(4) SCALE 300 KASHMIR SINGH VS. HARNAM SINGH AND ANOTHER.
State Bank Of India & Ors vs S.N. Goyal on 2 May, 2008
(iv) 2009-1-L.W.1 STATE BANK OF INDIA & OTHERS vs. S.N.GOYAL
A mere running of the eye over those decisions before getting down to the facts, would unambiguously and unequivocally exemplify and demonstrate that the court, which is seized of the second appeal would be reluctant to re-appreciate the facts. However, it has been pellucidly and palpably highlighted by the Hon'ble Apex Court that when there is perversity or illegality in the findings of both the courts below, the High Court would be justified in re-appreciating the evidence and arrive at a just conclusion.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 68 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1