Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.79 seconds)

All India Indian Overseas Bank Sc & St ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 31 October, 1996

2. It is the common case of all the parties, and which could not have been otherwise, that, parties are bound by the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of All India Indian Overseas Bank SC and ST Employees' Welfare Association and Others Vs. Union of India and Others (1996) 6 SCC 606, and which judgment has been recently followed by the Supreme Court in the case of Bank of Patiala & Ors. Vs. Vinesh Kumar Bhasin (2010) 4 SCC 368, and the ratio of the aforesaid two cases is that the Commission which acts as per the limited particular powers by which it is constituted has no powers which are provided to issue directions W.P.(C) No.3929/2014 Page 2 of 5 or injunctions or compliance orders with respect to a particular employer/ employee i.e the power prescribed is only to investigate and enquire into matters within the jurisdiction of the commission and as specified under Article 338 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 430 - S P Bharucha - Full Document

State Bank Of Patiala & Ors vs Vinesh Kumar Bhasin on 22 January, 2010

2. It is the common case of all the parties, and which could not have been otherwise, that, parties are bound by the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of All India Indian Overseas Bank SC and ST Employees' Welfare Association and Others Vs. Union of India and Others (1996) 6 SCC 606, and which judgment has been recently followed by the Supreme Court in the case of Bank of Patiala & Ors. Vs. Vinesh Kumar Bhasin (2010) 4 SCC 368, and the ratio of the aforesaid two cases is that the Commission which acts as per the limited particular powers by which it is constituted has no powers which are provided to issue directions W.P.(C) No.3929/2014 Page 2 of 5 or injunctions or compliance orders with respect to a particular employer/ employee i.e the power prescribed is only to investigate and enquire into matters within the jurisdiction of the commission and as specified under Article 338 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 58 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1