Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.32 seconds)Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section 42 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 52 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Dhanraj And Others, Smt. Venubai ... vs State Of Maharashtra on 16 September, 2002
Similarly, even though the Judgment of this Court in Dhanraj Vs. State,
the question arose about not establishing malkhanas as directed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, and therefore, this Court had given
directions by the said Judgment on 13.03.2019, and this case was prior to
the said directions.
Shajahan vs State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police on 16 February, 2018
The learned Counsel would contend
that the seized articles should have been forwarded immediately to the
Court and the delay in respect thereof is violative of Section 55 of the Act
and in this regard, he relied upon the Judgment in Shajahan Vs. State5,
2 2018 SCC OnLine MAD 2453
3 (2022) 6 SCC 294
4 (2001) 3 SCC 28
5 2018 SCC OnLine MAD 2453
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
18/30
Crl.A.Nos.15 & 175 of 2020
morefully relying upon paragraphs Nos.14 and 15 of the said Judgment.
S. Rajan vs State Asst. Collector Of Customs ... on 17 August, 1994
30.As a matter of fact, in respect of the delay, the Judgment of
S.Rajan Vs. State Asst.Collector of Customs (Intelligence) Madurai11, by
this Court relates to the seizure of 200 kgs of Ganja and when there is a
11 (1994) SCC Online Mad 295 : 1995 Cri LJ 1594
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
27/30
Crl.A.Nos.15 & 175 of 2020
delay of 65 days in producing the same before the Trial Court. This Court
had held that the same gives room for doubt. Whereas in the instant case,
the contraband is weighing 216 kgs and the delay was only 19 days.