Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)

Renji K Paul vs Revenue Divisional Officer (Rdo) on 14 February, 2019

The learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the Ext.P14 judgment rendered by this Court in WPC No.15168/2020 wherein various decisions including those rendered in LLMC, Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayath and others v. Mariumma and another [2015 (2) KLT 516 (DB)], Geo Peter v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2019 (3) KLT 838], Renji K.Paul v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2019 (2) KLT 262], Salim C.K. v. State of Kerala and others [2019 (3) KLT 604 (DB)] were relied on.
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 80 - S P Chaly - Full Document

The Tahsildar vs Renjith George on 29 January, 2020

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of quashing Ext.P6 order, by directing the 1st respondent to reconsider the Form-5 application submitted by the petitioner in the light of the observations made by this Court in this judgment and also in the light of Ext.P14 and the decisions rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Renjith George (supra). It is further directed that, in case the property of the petitioner is removed from the Data Bank, it shall be open to the petitioner to submit necessary applications WP(C)No.14337 of 2024 2025:KER:11311 11 under the provisions of Kerala Land Tax Act to get the property re-assessed in the revenue records by making necessary endorsement in this regard. It is further directed that the 1st respondent shall consider the application submitted by the petitioner in Form-5, and the orders shall be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, taking note of the observations made in this judgment and other decisions referred to above.
Kerala High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 7 - S P Chaly - Full Document
1