Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)Chandigarh Administration vs Jagjit Singh on 10 January, 1995
As long as the borewell, dug either by the Government or by the local
authority, is meant to provide drinking water to the members of the locality,
such a borewell would fall within the definition of a "public drinking water
source". I do not also see any merit in the submission of Sri K.S. Murthy,
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, that the impugned order is discriminatory.
It would not be proper for this Court to examine the plea of discrimination as
the other 59, who are said to have dug borewells in the vicinity, are not
arrayed as respondents in the Writ Petition and as no mandamus can be sought
from this Court to perpetuate an illegality, even if the bore-wells dug by the
other 59 is presumed to be illegal. (Chandigarh Administration v. Jagjit
Singh1).
Section 9 in Andhra Pradesh Water, Land and Trees Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in Andhra Pradesh Water, Land and Trees Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
1