Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.36 seconds)
Pradeep Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 April, 2010 cites

R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 15811 - J C Shah - Full Document

M/S Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.& ... vs Md Sharaful Haque & Anr on 1 November, 2004

192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicant has got a right of discharge under Section 239, 245(2) or 227/228, Cr.P.C. as the case may through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 16299 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Smt. Amrawati Devi And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 4 January, 2010

In the meantime the concerned Court may ask the prosecution to obtain instructions from the Investigating Officer and thereafter dispose of the bail application at the earliest in accordance with the decision in 3 Amrawati's case. It will also be open for the Court concerned to release the applicant on interim bail in an appropriate case on such terms and conditions that the concerned Court deems fit and proper till the next date of hearing of the bail application, if the hearing of the case is adjourned or the Court for any reason is not in a position to finally dispose of the bail application on that day, or some further instructions are needed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1122 - I Murtaza - Full Document

Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 23 March, 2009

In the light of the aforesaid observations of the Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and the observations of the Full Bench of this Court in Amarawati it is provided that if an application is moved before the competent Magistrate within 3 weeks, a date may be fixed for appearance of the applicant in about a week thereafter. The applicant may not be arrested without permission of the Magistrate between the date of moving of the application for surrender and the date fixed for his appearance in the Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 9870 - Full Document
1   2 Next