Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.47 seconds)
Punjab National Bank vs Sh. Sanjay Chandna on 22 December, 2022 cites

Topline Shoes Ltd vs Corporation Bank on 8 July, 2002

In the case of Topline Shoes Ltd. Vs. Corporation Bank reported in II (2002) CPJ 7 (SC), Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that "it is for the Forum or the Commission to consider all facts and circumstances along with the 4 provisions of the Act providing time frame to file reply, as a guideline, and then to exercise its discretion as best it may serve the ends of justice and achieve the object of speedy disposal of such cases keeping in mind the principle of natural justice as well."
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 405 - B Kumar - Full Document

Suraj Parkash Son Of Sh Ramesh Chander vs The Senior Manager Punjab National Bank on 22 November, 2022

This appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 10.11.2022 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dehradun (in short "The District Commission") in consumer complaint No. 546 of 2022; Sh. Sanjay Chandna Vs. Manager, Punjab National Bank, whereby the consumer complaint was allowed and the appellant - opposite party was directed to pay sum of Rs. 1,41,000/- to the respondent - complainant together with Rs. 20,000/- towards mental agony and Rs. 5,000/- towards litigation expenses, within a period of 30 days', failing which the respondent - complainant was further held entitled to interest @9% p.a. on the above amount from the date of institution of the consumer complaint till payment.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1