Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)
State Of U.P. And Another vs Chandra Prakash Shahi And Another on 27 November, 1997 cites

State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr vs Kaushal Kishore Shukla on 11 January, 1991

According to the State of U. P. the services of the appellant were terminated as per the rules on account of his unsultablltty by giving him one month's salary, which statement is not challenged before us. Therefore, we hold that the dictum laid down in the above Kaushal Kishore Shukla's case (supra) will squarely apply to the facts of the present case and that the order of termination 'simpliciter' cannot be challenged."
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 357 - K N Singh - Full Document

State Of U.P. And Another State Of U.P. ... vs Km. Prem Lata Misra And Others on 21 April, 1994

In view of the above law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, the U. P. Public Services Tribunal, was not correct in holding that the impugned order was founded on the allegations of misconduct and proceedings under Section 7 of the Police Act were necessary. The U. P. Public Services Tribunal was also Incorrect in holding that there was nothing on record to indicate that any separate enquiry was conducted to assess the suitability and as such, the action was by way of punishment without affording any opportunity in violation of Article 311(2) of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 57 - Full Document
1