Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.30 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Delhi Prevention of Touting and Malpractices Against Tourists Act, 2010
Section 100 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 165 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Tahir vs State (Delhi) on 21 March, 1996
Reliance in that regard is laid upon the judgment of
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Tahir Vs. State (Delhi) (1996) 3 SCC 338,
wherein it has been observed as hereinunder:
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Punjab vs Balbir Singh on 1 March, 1994
18. Apparently, the entire case has been framed at the police station itself.
Again, no public witnesses have joined during seizure proceedings of the allged
fake number plates. Under Section 100 (4) of Cr. P. C., a duty is cast upon the
police official conducting search from any person to call upon independent
witnesses to join the investigation. Although it is true that such procedure is not
always possible to follow because of the reluctance shown by the public
witnesses to join police investigation, nevertheless, it has been held in catena of
judgments that each case shall be determined on its own facts and circumstances.
At this juncture, reliance can be placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh (1994) 3 SCC 299 wherein
it was held as herein under:
Section 2 in The Delhi Prevention of Touting and Malpractices Against Tourists Act, 2010 [Entire Act]
1