Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.29 seconds)The Essential commodities act 1955
Additional Secretary To The Government ... vs Smt. Alka Subhash Gadia And Anr on 20 December, 1990
28. As observed hereinabove, it is not in dispute that
five different FIRs have been filed against the
petitioner and in the facts of the present case,
this Court is of the view that the case of the
petitioner does not fall within Clause - III & V
Page 28 of 33
Downloaded on : Sun Jan 16 13:22:41 IST 2022
C/SCA/12983/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2021
of the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in case of Alka Subhash Gadia (supra).
Further, the case of the petitioner cannot be
treated as rare or exceptional case. Hence, this
Court is not inclined to exercise of the powers
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India at
pre-detention/ pre-execution stage in favour of
the petitioner.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Essential commodities act 1955 [Entire Act]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 22 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Vijaysinh @ Gatti Pruthvisinh Rathod vs State Of Gujarat & on 3 December, 2014
31. Even as per the decision of the Full Bench of this
Court in case of Vijaysinh @ Gatti Pruthvisinh
Rathod (supra), the Court is not obliged and/or
bound to call for the original file, order of
detention and the grounds for detention to satisfy
itself whether the order of detention is
sustainable or not. Therefore in the facts of the
present case also, this Court is not inclined to
call for the file and/or to examine the proposed
order of detention.