Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)The Railways (Amendment) Act, 2003
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
The learned Counsel for the private respondents has rightly
submitted that the reasons furnished for not giving employment is not
based on the aforesaid circular but on a specious plea that the work in
the project did not commence. Reliance has been placed on "Mohinder
Singh Gill and another vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, New
Delhi and others, reported in AIR 1978 SC 851 to contend that, "when
a statutory functionary makes an order based on certain grounds its
validity must be judged by the reasons so mentioned and cannot be
supplemented by fresh reasons in the shape of affidavit or otherwise.
Otherwise, an order bad in the beginning may, by the time it comes to
court on account of a challenge, get validated by additional grounds later
brought out."
State Of Karnataka & Ors vs C. Lalitha on 31 January, 2006
Further they have also relied on a judgment in State of Karnataka
& Ors. vs. C. Lalitha reported in (2006) 2 SCC 747, wherein it was held
that "all persons similarly situated should be treated similarly irrespective
of the fact that only one person has approached the court."
The Railways Act, 1989
1