Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.37 seconds)Section 141 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 427 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Tamil Nadu Prohibition Of Harassment Of Women Act, 1998 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
4.3.Due to the petty dispute between them, the complainant made a
complaint and final report was filed and the same was taken on file in
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/11/2025 09:45:25 pm )
Suo Motu TR.(MD).No.13719 of 2025
C.C.No.17 of 2024 and pending for more than one year. Both parties
buried the hatchet without being influenced and filed the compromise
memo. Considering that the dispute is trivial in nature and now both the
complainant and accused have settled their dispute voluntarily without any
threat or coercion, and living peacefully and since the case comes within
the parameters of law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in the
cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another reported in (2012)
10 SCC 303, State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and Others
reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688 and other related judgments and the case is
pending without trial for more than three years and continuation of the trial
by examining the witnesses would lead to wastage of time and wastage of
Government exchequer and also lead to docket explosion without
adjudication and the chance of conviction even after the full-fledged trial
also is bleak, this Court is inclined to quash the proceedings by exercising
power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M.P.State Tourism Dev.Corpn. vs Laxmi Narayan &Ors.; on 27 April, 2015
4.3.Due to the petty dispute between them, the complainant made a
complaint and final report was filed and the same was taken on file in
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/11/2025 09:45:25 pm )
Suo Motu TR.(MD).No.13719 of 2025
C.C.No.17 of 2024 and pending for more than one year. Both parties
buried the hatchet without being influenced and filed the compromise
memo. Considering that the dispute is trivial in nature and now both the
complainant and accused have settled their dispute voluntarily without any
threat or coercion, and living peacefully and since the case comes within
the parameters of law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in the
cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another reported in (2012)
10 SCC 303, State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and Others
reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688 and other related judgments and the case is
pending without trial for more than three years and continuation of the trial
by examining the witnesses would lead to wastage of time and wastage of
Government exchequer and also lead to docket explosion without
adjudication and the chance of conviction even after the full-fledged trial
also is bleak, this Court is inclined to quash the proceedings by exercising
power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1