Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)
Balvir Singh And Anr. vs Mahendra Kumar And Ors. on 2 September, 2003 cites

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Anjana Shyam And Ors. on 28 December, 1999

3. The advocate for the appellants has relied upon B.V. Nagaraju v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., , National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Anjana Shyam, 2000 ACJ 1585 (HP) and Radhey Shyam Agarwal v. Gayatri Devi, 1998 ACJ 1177 (MP). However, these are the cases in which overloading of the vehicle was not held to be a fundamental breach of the permit conditions.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 6 - L S Panta - Full Document

Radhey Shyam Agarwal And Anr. vs Gayatri Devi W/O Mahendra Prasad Das And ... on 22 November, 1996

3. The advocate for the appellants has relied upon B.V. Nagaraju v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., , National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Anjana Shyam, 2000 ACJ 1585 (HP) and Radhey Shyam Agarwal v. Gayatri Devi, 1998 ACJ 1177 (MP). However, these are the cases in which overloading of the vehicle was not held to be a fundamental breach of the permit conditions.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Uma Devi And Ors. on 6 January, 1998

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Uma Devi, 2000 ACJ 1451 (MP), was a case in which truck was used for carrying passengers. The goods vehicles were allowed to carry passengers according to the rules. The presence of owner when the passengers had mounted the vehicle or permitted them to travel could not be proved and no breach of permit conditions by the owner of vehicle was held proved. Such is certainly not the case here. Actually, in the present case permit conditions are not proved. Thus, it cannot be said that there has been any breach of permit condition.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 3 - S Singh - Full Document
1