Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)The Electricity Act, 2003
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Punjab & Ors vs Dhanjit Singh Sandhu on 14 March, 2014
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras vs V. Mr. P. Firm, Muar on 26 October, 1964
(SCC pp. 153-54, paras 22-23 & 25-26)
"22. The doctrine of "approbate and reprobate" is
only a species of estoppel, it implies only to the conduct of
parties. As in the case of estoppel it cannot operate
against the provisions of a statue. (Vide CIT v. MR. P.
Firm Muar.)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.N. Gosain A vs Yashpal Dhir on 23 October, 1992
In R.N. Gosain v.
Yashpal Dhir this Court has observed as under: (R.N.
Gosain case, SCC pp. 687-88, para 10)
"10. Law does not permit a person to both
approbate and reprobate. This principle is based on the
doctrine of election which postulates that no party can
accept and reject the same instrument and that a person
cannot say at one time that a transaction is valid and
thereby obtain some advantage, to which he could only be
entitled on the footing that it is valid, and then turn round
and say it is void for the purpose of securing some other
advantage"
Union Of India vs N Murugesan on 7 October, 2021
Insofar as the contention raised by the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner regarding limitation, he relied upon the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in (2022) 2
SCC 25 in the case of Union of India and ors Vs. N.Murugesan and
ors, which held as follows :-
1