Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)

Rajasthan State Shriganganagar Sugar ... vs Ajeet Singh on 4 September, 2023

IO recorded his disclosure statement vide already Ex. PW2/4. He got recovered two biometric machines from his house/jhuggi. IO kept both the biometric machines in white colour cloth and sealed the same with the seal of "GS". IO prepared seizure memo of recovered biometric machines already Ex. PW1/B. IO prepared arrest memo of accused Ajit already Ex. PW1/A. IO prepared personal search memo of Digitally signed RAGHAV by RAGHAV SHARMA FIR no. 343/2018 State Vs. Ajeet Singh 15:08:01 +0530 5/11 SHARMA Date: 2025.08.06 accused Ajit already Ex. PW2/5. Thereafter, IO recorded statement of Prabhakaran and Umesh Chand u/s 161 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, Prabhakaran and Umesh Chand left the investigation. During further course of investigation, he along with IO, Ct. Ashok, accused Ajit, CCL "M" went to the house of Shivam at Sangam Vihar. Shivam was found present at his house. During enquiry IO came to know that Shivam was juvenile. IO enquired with CCL "S" and recorded his version vide already Ex. PW2/6. He got recovered one biometric machine from the iron trunk which was kept inside his house. IO seized the recovered biometric machine from the possession of CCL "S" and sealed the same with the seal of "GS". IO prepared seizure memo vide already Ex. PW2/7. IO prepared apprehension memo of CCL "S" vide already Ex. PW2/8. Thereafter, they brought accused Ajit, CCL "M" and "S" along with the recovered case property to PS. IO deposited the case properties in the Malkhana. Thereafter, IO sent both the CCLs to AIIMS Hospital for their medical examination along with Ct. Ashok and Ct. Munnalal. After medical examination Ct. Ashok and Ct. Munnalal shifted both the CCLs to Seva Kutir. At this stage, photographs of recovered biometric machines are shown to the witness and he correctly identified the same. The same are now Ex. P1 (colly.). He does not remember the serial no. of the biometric machines, however, the same had been mentioned in the seizure memo.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

The State Of Chhattisgarh vs Sadhuram And Ors. 56 Revp/184/2018 ... on 4 July, 2019

IO RAGHAV by RAGHAV SHARMA FIR no. 343/2018 State Vs. Ajeet Singh SHARMA Date: 2025.08.06 7/11 15:08:16 +0530 kept both the biometric machines in white colour cloth and sealed the same with the seal of "GS". IO have prepared seizure memo of recovered biometric machines already Ex. PW1/B. IO prepared arrest memo of accused Ajit already Ex. PW1/A. IO prepared personal search memo of accused Ajit now Ex. PW2/5. Thereafter, IO recorded statement of Prabhakaran and Umesh Chand u/s 161 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, Prabhakaran and Umesh Chand left the investigation. During further course of investigation, he along with IO, SI Satvender, accused Ajit, CCL "M" went to the house of Shivam at Sangam Vihar. Shivam was found present at his house. During enquiry IO came to know that Shivam was juvenile. IO enquired with CCL "S" and recorded his version vide Ex. PW2/6. He got recovered one biometric machine from the iron trunk which was kept inside his house. IO seized the recovered biometric machine from the possession of CCL "S" and sealed the same with the seal of "GS". IO prepared seizure memo vide Ex. PW2/7. IO prepared apprehension memo of CCL "S" vide Ex. PW2/8. Thereafter, they brought accused Ajit, CCL "M" and "S" along with the recovered case property to PS. IO deposited the case properties in the Malkhana. Thereafter, IO sent both the CCLs to AIIMS Hospital for their medical examination along with me and Ct. Munnalal. After medical examination he and Ct. Munnalal shifted both the CCLs to Seva Kutir. Thereafter, IO got conducted medical examination of accused Ajit. After medical examination, IO kept accused Ajit in the PS. The photographs of recovered biometric machines are correctly identified. The same are already Ex. P1 (colly.). He does not remember the serial no. of the biometric machines, however, the same had been mentioned in the seizure memo.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 116 - Full Document
1