Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)H. H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jiwaji ... vs Union Of India on 15 December, 1970
"6. The eleven judge constitutional bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court
speaking through Hidayatullah, C.J. has made extremely valid
observations in its decision of H.H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao
Jivaji Rao Scindia Bahadur of Gwalior vs. UOI [AIR 1971 SC 530]
wherein special regard was given to the accession procedure of
Bhopal. Following paragraphs are very pertinent for the purpose of the
case before us as it shall act as a beacon to guide the ship of
contentions to the port of reasoning.
Article 291 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mr.Z U Alvi vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 31 January, 2011
6. We find no reason to deviate from our findings and observations made in the
decision notice of the Z.U. Alvi case (supra) and hence, are of the view that the
information requested by the Appellant shall be provided to him in the same
manner. The information is not exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act as the
information sought is more than 20 years old. The exemption clauses are not
applicable in view of Section 8(3) of the RTI Act which reads as follows :-
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Public Records Act, 1993
1