Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
Devkinandan Tiwari vs State Industrial Court And Ors. on 1 March, 1990 cites

Management Of Hindustan Machine Tools ... vs Mohd. Usman And Anr. on 24 August, 1983

It is clear from the decision referred to above, that in the case of Mohd. Usman (supra) the Labour Court after considering the nature of misconduct, held that the punishment of termination of service was disproportionately heavy and, therefore, reduced the punishment to stoppage of the increments for two years. But from the facts of the aforesaid case, it is not clear as to what was the nature of misconduct said to have been committed by the employee by reason of which a lenient view in respect of award of punishment was taken.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 30 - Full Document

Scooters India Limited vs Labour Court And Ors. on 30 September, 1988

In the case of Scooter India Ltd. (supra), the misconduct said to have been committed was rough behaviour, bordering only on rudeness and it was for this reason that the punishment of dismissal from service was substituted by the Labour Court by punishment of withholding of 75 percent back wages. Thus, on facts the decisions relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner are distinguishable, while in the instant case having regard to the gravity and seriousness of misconduct the interference by the Industrial Court cannot be said to be improper or unjustified.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 61 - Full Document
1