Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 441 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 442 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Rajinder & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 12 July, 1995
In a case titled as Rajinder Vs. State of Haryana, (1995) 5 SCC 187 it has
been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the unauthorised entry into or upon the
property in the possession of another or unlawfully remaining thereafter lawful entry can
answer the definition of criminal trespass if, and only if, such unlawful entry or unlawful
remaining is with the intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy the
person in possession of the property. Therefore, unless any of the ingredients referred in
Section 441 IPC is proved, no offence of criminal trespass can be said to have been
committed. Such an intention has to be gathered from the facts and circumstances of a
given case.
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Gokak Patel Volkart Ltd vs Dundayya Gurushiddaiah Hiremath And ... on 14 February, 1991
In a case titled as Gokak Patel Volkart Ltd. v. Dundayya Gurushiddaiah
Hiremath, (1991) 2 SCC 141 Supreme Court has observed that:
Rash Behari Chatterjee vs Fagu Shaw & Ors on 28 April, 1969
In Rash Behari Chatterjee v. Fagu Shaw, (1969) 2 SCC 216, it was
Page No. 12 of 23
observed that:
Section 281 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1