Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.38 seconds)
Dugesh Rathore vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 November, 2021 cites

Santosh Kumar Dubey vs State Of U.P. &Ors on 18 May, 2009

Santosh Kumar Dubey v. State of U.P., (2009) 6 SCC 481 "12. The request for appointment on compassionate grounds should be reasonable and proximate to the time of the death of the bread earner of the family, inasmuch as the very purpose of giving such benefit is to make financial help available to the family to overcome sudden economic crisis occurring in the family of the deceased who has died in harness. But this, however, cannot be another source of recruitment. This also cannot be treated as a bonanza and also as a right to get an appointment in government service."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 196 - M Sharma - Full Document

Director Of Education (Secondary) & Anr vs Pushpendra Kumar & Others on 13 May, 1998

In fact such a view has been expressed in the very decision cited by the petitioner in Director of Education Vs. Pushpendra Kumar. It is also significant to notice that on the date when the first application was made by the petitioner on 02/06/1988, the petitioner was a minor and was not eligible for appointment. This is conceded by the petitioner. There cannot be reservation of a vacancy till such time as a petitioner becomes a major after a number of years, unless there are some specific provisions. The very basis of compassionate appointment is to see that the family gets immediate relief."
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 1064 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

Managing Director Madhya Pradesh ... vs Ashiq Shah on 7 June, 2021

5. The very purpose of granting compassionate appointment is to provide an immediate helping hand to the family in distress. After more than 20 years from the date of death of petitioner's father if direction is issued to grant compassionate appointment or 2 WP No.12801/2021 consideration, it will frustrate the very purpose of compassionate appointment. The division bench of this Court in WA No.10/2020 decided on 7.6.2021 in the matter of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. & Ors Vs. Ashq Shah & another has taken note of legal journey in cases of delay in seeking compassionate appointment. It is apt to quote the relevant portion:-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 31 - M Rafiq - Full Document

Mohd. Fiazuddin Khan vs Govt. Of India And Ors. on 25 November, 1975

In view of principles laid down in the aforesaid judgments, we are unable to countenance the order of learned writ court. No directions could have been issued for consideration on compassionate ground after almost 24 years from the date of death of father of respondent No.1. The very purpose of grant of compassionate appointment will be defeated if claims of compassionate appointment after decades are entertained."
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 12 - P N Shinghal - Full Document
1