Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)
Sri. Mallappa S/O. Shankarappa Rampur vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 March, 2022 cites

Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai vs State Of Bihar on 17 December, 2019

18. It is also to be noticed that the Apex Court in the case of Dr.(Major)Meeta Sahai (supra) relied on by has clarified that the candidate, who has taken part in the recruitment process would in fact challenge the said process at a later point of time. However, it is clarified at para-18 that such challenge could be made only if the notification, pursuant to which the petitioner has participated is contrary to the statutory rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 78 - S Kant - Full Document

Ashok Kumar & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 5 September, 2018

11. It is contended that in light of the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Ashok Kumar and Another v. State of Bihar and Others reported in (2017) 4 SCC 357, wherein it is held that a party who participates in the recruitment process cannot at a subsequent stage after being unsuccessful challenge the result by way of writ petition as it was hit by the principle of estoppel. Accordingly, it is submitted that the writ appeal be dismissed.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 59 - M K Shah - Full Document
1