Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.16 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Anil Sood vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court Ii on 1 December, 2000
The
decision in the case of Anil Sood (supra) has also been confirmed in
the cases of Radha Krishna Mani Tripathi Vs. L.H.Patel and
Anr.(2009) 2 SCC 81 and Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangathan Vs.
R.V.Palde & others (2008) 17 SCC 683. It is quite clear there
therefore that the order dated 13.9.1996 dismissing the application
under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC which was moved within 30 days from the
date of the knowledge of the award has been wrongly dismissed on the
ground that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction.
Radhakrishna Mani Tripathi vs L.H. Patel & Anr on 21 November, 2008
The
decision in the case of Anil Sood (supra) has also been confirmed in
the cases of Radha Krishna Mani Tripathi Vs. L.H.Patel and
Anr.(2009) 2 SCC 81 and Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangathan Vs.
R.V.Palde & others (2008) 17 SCC 683. It is quite clear there
therefore that the order dated 13.9.1996 dismissing the application
under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC which was moved within 30 days from the
date of the knowledge of the award has been wrongly dismissed on the
ground that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 44 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1