Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)
Sujata Narayan Dahiwale vs M/O Railways on 14 September, 2018 cites

Local Administration Department & Anr vs M. Selvanayagam @ Kumaravelu on 5 April, 2011

Reliance placed by the respondents' advocate on the Apex Court case law in Local 12 OA.2129/2014 Administration Department & Anr. Vs. M. Selvanayagam @ Kumaravelu is also correct and relevant. 4(f). In view of these conclusions, I find that the O.A. submitted by Kum.Sujata Vasant Dahiwale is totally devoid of merits and unjustified, hence it cannot be allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 655 - A Alam - Full Document

Mgb Gramin Bank vs Chakrawarti Singh on 7 August, 2013

4(a). As held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in MGB Gramin Bank Vs. Chakrawarti in Civil Appeal No.6348/2013 (arising out of SLP(C)No.13957/2010) 8 OA.2129/2014 (Para 5) that mere death of the Government employee in harness does not entitle the family to claim compassionate employment. The Competent Authority has to examine the financial condition of the family of the deceased employee and it is only if it is satisfied that without providing employment, the family will not be able to meet the crisis, that a job is to be offered to the eligible member of the family. Also the person claiming such appointment must possess required eligibility for the post. Compassionate employment cannot be claimed as a matter of right, as it is not a vested right. The provision for liberal interpretation beyond permissible limits on humanitarian ground should not be stretched by the Court. Such appointment can be provided immediately to redeem the family in distress. It is improper to keep such a case pending for years.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 853 - Full Document

Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994

In another case Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (1994) 4 SCC 138 decided on 04.05.1994 the Apex Court examined the considerations which should guide while giving appointment in public services on compassionate grounds. As a rule, appointments in public services should be made strictly on the basis of open invitation of applications and merit. One such 9 OA.2129/2014 exception to this rule is in favour of the dependents of an employee dying in harness and leaving his family in penury and without any means of livelihood. The whole object of granting compassionate employment is thus to enable the family to tide over the sudden crisis. It must be remembered in this connection that as against the destitute family of the deceased there are millions of the other families which are equally, if not more destitute. Such an employment cannot be claimed and offered whatever the lapse of time and after the crisis is over. The compassionate employment cannot be granted after lapse of reasonable period which must be specified in the rule.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 2647 - P B Sawant - Full Document
1