Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (1.37 seconds)The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002
Section 5 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Smt.Soodamani Dorai vs The Joint Director Of Enforcement ... on 4 October, 2018
He further submits that after
providing opportunity and in the light of section 8(4) of the said Act read
with Rule 5 (1) of the said Rules the property in question was taken on
28.06.2021 and the notice was affixed properly on the wall and the gate
of the premises and the Panchnama to that effect has been prepared and
the petitioner was also signed on the said Panchnama. He submits that
the petitioner is having alternative remedy of appeal under section 26 of
the said Act and in the light of section 9 of the said Act, to approach the
Special court where the proceeding is still pending. He submits that for
this disputed question of fact, the remedy is there to the petitioner to file
appropriate petition in the light of the statutory provision under the said
Act. He relied in the case of "Smt. Soodamani Dorai v. The Joint Director
of Enforcement (PMLA), Directorate of Enforcement and Ors." reported in
2018 SC Online Madras 3138. Paragraph nos. 60, 67, 68 and 69 of the
said judgment are quoted hereinbelow: